People having perverse thinking may also commit mistakes unknowingly. When such people commit mistakes unknowingly, they do not agree that they have committed a mistake. In all other cases, people commit mistakes unknowingly. In those cases, they are ignorant towards mistakes committed by them.
There may be two causes of committing mistakes unknowingly. In one case, person knows what is right and what is wrong, but he performs a thing without analyzing the thing done with an eye of an impartial critic. One can say that such thing has been done without giving a proper thought. In second case, the person does not have knowledge of doing a particular thing properly. In this case, one can say that thing has been done without having proper knowledge. In first case, the person, who has committed a mistake, needs impartial critic eye and in second case, he needs a teacher who can point out his mistake and may impart him with correct way of performing a particular thing.
There is no difficulty in identifying an impartial critic eye and a true teacher. Where you have committed a mistake without analyzing right or wrong, after the critic draws your attention, you get satisfied. Where you have committed a mistake without knowing the correct way of doing it, after the critic gives its suggestion, you can experience it by acting upon the suggestion and can see outcome.
Unless you have perverse thinking, you always need an impartial critic eye who can point out your mistakes and a teacher who can tell your mistakes and impart you with proper knowledge. So there is nothing to lose your temper when somebody, without having perverse thinking, points out your mistakes and /or tells you the way of doing a thing properly.
There may be two causes of committing mistakes unknowingly. In one case, person knows what is right and what is wrong, but he performs a thing without analyzing the thing done with an eye of an impartial critic. One can say that such thing has been done without giving a proper thought. In second case, the person does not have knowledge of doing a particular thing properly. In this case, one can say that thing has been done without having proper knowledge. In first case, the person, who has committed a mistake, needs impartial critic eye and in second case, he needs a teacher who can point out his mistake and may impart him with correct way of performing a particular thing.
There is no difficulty in identifying an impartial critic eye and a true teacher. Where you have committed a mistake without analyzing right or wrong, after the critic draws your attention, you get satisfied. Where you have committed a mistake without knowing the correct way of doing it, after the critic gives its suggestion, you can experience it by acting upon the suggestion and can see outcome.
Unless you have perverse thinking, you always need an impartial critic eye who can point out your mistakes and a teacher who can tell your mistakes and impart you with proper knowledge. So there is nothing to lose your temper when somebody, without having perverse thinking, points out your mistakes and /or tells you the way of doing a thing properly.
